Turnbull abandons Gonski
The Coalition’s education plan is an attempt to get through an election year without addressing the long-term underfunding of disadvantaged schools.
We now have a clear choice between the major parties on Gonski after Malcolm Turnbull announced at the weekend he would not deliver Gonski in full.
His alternative policy will hurt disadvantaged students and will leave schools at least $3 billion short of the resources they need.
It means the great work that schools are already doing with Gonski funding, lifting results through more support and attention for students, won’t be extended.
Malcolm Turnbull’s policy would see disadvantaged schools miss out on the boost to resources they should be getting from the last two years of Gonski funding in 2018 and 2019.
This means an end to needs-based funding and many schools, especially disadvantaged public schools, never reaching the minimum resources standards the Gonski Review recommended.
It leaves us with a clear choice between the Coalition, and Labor and the Greens which support the full six years of Gonski and the $4.5 billion in extra resources our schools need.
It’s a choice between investing in our kids, or limiting their opportunities.
No detail, not enough funding to schools
Mr Turnbull’s plan would see an extra $1.2 billion go to schools from 2018-2020, increasing funding by just 3.56% per student per year.
This would restore a small fraction of Tony Abbott’s planned cuts to school funding but we currently have no idea of how the money will be distributed or what it will be spent on.
Details of how the policy would work are sketchy. There is still no confirmation of how the increased funding will be distributed and what amounts will go to public and private schools.
There is no obligation on state and territory governments to increase or maintain their own funding to schools, and no guarantee states will honour their share of the Gonski agreements.
This smacks of a pre-election fix, rather than an attempt to address the resource shortages which are stopping schools providing the support their students need.
What students will miss out on
This funding is urgently needed in many schools which have high numbers of disadvantaged students and low levels of resourcing. This funding is needed to make sure schools have the programs to overcome the barriers that are stopping students from reaching their potential.
- We have less than half kids with disability getting funded support. Almost 8 out of 10 principals say they can’t fund disability properly.
- Research show the gaps in achievement between disadvantaged and rich kids are three years and grow between Year Three and Year Nine.
- 1-in-7 15-year-olds struggle to read properly and kids from disadvantaged areas are five times more likely to perform poorly at school than those from wealthy areas.
Gonski has allowed schools to provide more support to students and is already delivering results but we know that many schools still can’t extend these programs to every child that needs them until they get the full six years of funding.
We need to decide if we want all students to be able to benefit from smaller classes, increased one-to-one support, targeted literacy and numeracy programs or support to complete Year 12.
If the answer is yes, then we need the full six years of Gonski.
In comments which showed a total lack of understanding of what Gonski is doing, and how great the need is, Education Minister Simon Birmingham said that Gonski funding will just be used to "build a second or third sports shed or pretty up a school gate”.
He needs to visit some of the schools where Gonski is making a difference.
Conditions on states and territories won’t make a difference
Malcolm Turnbull wants to impose conditions on states and territories in return for the funding, which he says will ensure that the funding is spent properly.
However there is no obligation on the states to maintain their own funding, or to honour their share of the Gonski agreements.
Some of the conditions make sense, but need to be backed up with resources to have any effect.
For example, states would be required to conduct literacy tests on all Year 1 students to check their reading. This is all very well, but what happens next? Schools need the resources in place to help students who are struggling with literacy, and that is what Gonski is giving them.
This plan is simply an attempt to get through an election year without addressing the long-term underfunding of disadvantaged schools which is hurting our kids.
We will continue our campaign for bipartisan support for the full six years but it appears that the Coalition has decided it has more pressing priorities than investing in our schools.
They need to understand that students are missing out on the support they need because their schools don’t have the resources to provide it.
They need to understand the massive economic benefits of ensuring all students leave school with basic skills needed for the workforce.
We need the Federal Government to deliver its share of the last two years of Gonski. Not a quick fix that will leave schools $3 billion short.
What does it mean for the NT?
We don’t have any details of how the funding under this model will be allocated on a state-by-state basis.
The AEU NT is concerned the NT could lose out more than other states if the additional costs of service delivery in our jurisdiction are not factored into the new model. The Giles Government raised these concerns in a recent submission to a Senate inquiry. Minister Chandler made assurances that an agreement would be negotiated that works for the NT, but it looks we may not have any detail until after the federal election.
The AEU NT will be seeking answers on this issue in the coming days from federal members of Parliament, the NT Education Minister and our Department of Education.
What can you do?
Visit the I Give A Gonski website and show your support for Australian schools.
Thank you for reading
If you found this information useful, please share on your social media platform of choice, and help spread the word.